Friday, April 4, 2014

World zinc and lead markets seen in deficit this year - ILZSG ( The International Lead and Zinc Study Group )



World zinc and lead markets seen in deficit this year - ILZSG ( International Lead and Zinc Study Group )

The global market for refined zinc is expected to be in deficit by 117,000 tonnes this year and refined lead in deficit by 49,000 tonnes, the International Lead and Zinc Study Group (ILZSG) said on Thursday.
Zinc demand is expected to rise 4.5 percent to 13.58 million tonnes this year while refined supply increases 4.4 percent to 13.46 million tonnes, the group said in a statement following its spring meetings.
"Having remained relatively stable for the past four years, Chinese production of refined zinc metal is expected to rise by 7.3 percent in 2014 and this is the main factor behind an anticipated overall increase in global production," it said.
In lead, demand is expected to rise 4.4 percent to 11.73 million tonnes and refined supply to by 4.3 percent to 11.68 million tonnes.

Thursday, April 3, 2014

Edward Meir, Indepent Commodity Consultant April 2014 Report - BASE METAL

Edward Meir, Indepent Commodity Consultant April 2014 Report - BASE METAL
The following is an excerpt from monthly market overview for April 2014, written by Edward Meir, Indepent Commodity Consultant with INTL FCStone Inc.
3-MONTH LME COPPER
Copper crashed in March, with prices falling by roughly $760/ton from the $7085 high to the intraday low of $6321 before a decent bounce set in over the last week. A slew of worse-than-expected Chinese macroeconomic indicators has been the main reason behind the weakness, coupled with the fact that February refined copper imports dropped some 30% from January's record levels. In addition, Chinese copper premiums remain weak, while Shanghai inventories have climbed to nine-month highs. Moreover, investors were shaken by reports of sizable corporate defaults, this time by companies “close to home” such as a real estate developer and a steel mill. Finally, the fact that the Chinese government did not take any action to make anyone whole in the aftermath of these defaults was a clear signal to investors that they were on their own. The fear now is that stockpiles of commodities, which are typically used to raise financing such as copper and iron ore, may be liquidated further in order to raise cash. Although still unsubstantiated, there are reports some 700,000 tons of copper are being financed and held “off exchange”, but we think that fears of mass liquidation at this stage are overblown. Prices rebounded lately on talk that the Chinese government may order stimulus spending in order to stabilize growth, but we don’t think this is necessarily going to do much other than lead to a short-term and a likely ill-fated bounce. In April, we see prices trading between $6400-$6850
3-MONTH LME ALUMINIUM
Aluminum did not do much over the course of March, ending the month slightly higher. Underlining the grim state of affairs, China's Chalco warned that at current prices, around half of China's aluminum producers are losing money. In fact, Chinese smelters are shutting capacity, but the cutbacks are being offset by more efficient operators and new startups. Chalco expects Chinese output to rise 7.6% this year to 26.8 million tons, but we would not be surprised to see the actual number come in slightly less than that by the time the year is over. We say this in view of the fact that the government seems to be serious about weeding out excess capacity across a number of industries. Additionally, aluminum prices in Shanghai sank to a record low last month, but importantly, did not bring out any kind of government buying for the stockpile, an indication that the authorities may want to let industry fend for itself. In the meantime, we are seeing continued cutbacks in non-Chinese production, including a 147,000 ton decrease put through by Alcoa-Brazil last week, lending more credence to the view that the ex-Chinese balance is now moving towards a greater deficit. (The IAI has February global output ex-China at 1.87 million tons, down from 2.05 million tons in January). For the month ahead, we see prices trading between $1720-$1840. However, we are much more upbeat on prices for later this year, as we think investors will have to start to discount a tighter market going into 2015 as cutbacks –even from China – start to accelerate. Financial problems at Rusal are also something to watch and could be a short-term bullish wild card.
3-MONTH LME ZINC
Zinc sold off over the course of March, with the complex losing about $200/MT at one point, although critically, key double-bottom support at $1940 held.  On the LME side, stocks actually increased over the course of the month, as did holdings in Shanghai, with both these variables contributing to the negative tone as well. In addition, further selling came our way during the middle of the month on reports that a large accumulation of unreported zinc inventories (said to total as much as 500,000 tons) could potentially be delivered against a large short position. We were skeptical about the story at the time and at the end, the delivery never materialized. On the fundamental side, the zinc balance continues to show signs of tightening. In its latest report, the ILZSG said that zinc was in deficit by 60,000 in January, a number that matched 2013’s entire shortfall. In addition there was a large uptake of zinc imports judging from the latest January/February Chinese trade figures, but given the slowing economy, we don’t know how much of this is being siphoned off into financing deals. Over the course of the month, we see zinc trading between $1915-$2060, but like aluminum, we are friendlier to the metal heading into year-end, as investors come around to discounting the prospect of a growing deficit in 2015.
3-MONTH LME LEAD
Similar to other metals, lead finished lower over the course of March, hitting nine-month lows at one point before recovering a touch going into month end. We continue to be rather surprised by lead’s relative poor performance and attribute March’s decline to the blowback from lower copper prices . In addition, LME stocks are not falling as hard as they once were, likely another reason for the sluggish tone.  In the meantime, the ILZSG reported last month that lead was in deficit by 31,000 tons in January, almost equivalent to the entire shortfall seen last year, but this failed to generate much upside excitement. In addition, lead’s ending stock ratio is now at 2.8, among the lowest in the LME group. We still like the prospects for lead going forward given that many of the variables we have highlighted in our previous commentary, including a structural deficit aggravated by mine closures and mounting environmental costs are still in place. One way to perhaps trade the complex is to go long lead and short zinc; the differential between the two got to a low of $31 at one point last month, down from $247 in November. It is now around $118 but we suspect it may have more room to expand given that the two are not entirely unrelated in terms of supply. In April, we see lead trading between $2020-$2170.
3-MONTH LME NICKEL
Nickel continued worked sharply higher this past month, gaining a whopping $2,000 a ton at one point, as Indonesian concerns and worries about possible sanctions against Russian metal boosted prices. However, a correction of sorts has set in of late, with prices retracing from the $16,400 intraday high reached in March. We suspect that the current selloff will prove to be short-lived, as the underlying picture still looks constructive. For one thing, Indonesian legislative elections that take place on April 9th may not result in any immediate change in policy with respect to the ban and so we may have to wait until the presidential elections are over in July before we see any change. In addition, CRU estimates that Chinese port stockpiles of nickel ore are down by some 4 million tons since the ban went into effect, paring China’s overall port holdings by some 20% and telling us that the restrictions are clearly starting to have some effect. CRU also calculates that for every week the ban is in place, an additional 750,000 tons of inventory is displaced. But whatever happens going forward, we should note that the rally in nickel this year is an artificially-induced move and as such, it has the potential to collapse under its own weight. The more relevant question is when; we think it will be later rather than sooner and accordingly, we expect to see a $15,400-$16,400 range prevailing at least through April.
3-MONTH LME TIN
Tin prices were range-bound over the course of March, trading within a $1000/ton band and closing the month pretty much flat. The market’s weaker spell occurred early on in March, just about the time when the Indonesians announced that refined tin shipments increased to 6,000 tons in February, up 30% from January. However, given the inconsistency in the data (exports have bounced around from 4,600 tons to 13,560 tons over the past three months) investors chose not to sell aggressively into the February number, as we suspect they remained uneasy about the supply pipeline going forward. For their part, the Indonesians are talking the market up; PT Timah says that it sees exports down some 35% this year on account of trading rules that make purchases contingent on trading in the domestic exchange. More broadly, PT Timah expects the global tin deficit to grow to 20,000 tons this year, almost double the 12,000 shortfall put out by ITRI and well ahead of the 3,000 ton January consensus figure issued by Reuters. Like nickel, we expect tin prices to work lower once the Indonesian restrictions become more flexible and supply starts to flow more freely, but unlike nickel, we think the Indonesians may see their tin program enjoy more long-term success. Over the course of April, we expect prices to trade between $22,400-$23,400.

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

No disruption to supply, ports operating as normal following earthquake - Antofagasta

Chilean copper miner Antofagasta has confirmed its operations were not affected by the 8.2-magnitude earthquake that struck off the northern coast of the country.

The ports for Pelambres, Esperanza and Michilla were all evacuated after a tsunami warning was issued, but this has now been lifted. 

No disruption to supply, ports operating as normal following earthquake - Antofagasta


India trims import tariff value of Gold, Silver in early April 2014

India trims import tariff value of Gold, Silver in early April 2014
The Indian Government on Tuesday announced cut in import tariff value for gold and silver. The import tariff value of gold was slashed by 5.39% and that of silver was reduced by 7.20%, in tandem with prices of precious metals in the international market.
The Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) issued notification in this regard reducing the gold import tariff value to $421 per 10 grams. The import tariffs are being slashed from the existing $445 per 10 grams. Meanwhile the import tariff value of Silver has also been cut from $694 per kilogram to $644 per kilogram.
The government move to lower the import tariff value is in track with the weakening gold prices in the global and domestic markets. Gold in India extended losses for third straight day falling by Rs.40 to Rs. 29,260 per ten grams in New Delhi. On the other hand, Silver made a marginal rebound of Rs.100 to touch Rs. 43,500 per kilogram, snapping its two-day fall. The yellow metal hit fresh seven-week low on Tuesday, forcing the government to cut the import tariff value.
The gold imports during the financial year ended March 31st is estimated to be at six-year low of 557 tonnes, as against 815 tonnes imported during the prior fiscal year. The imposition of tight controls over gold imports including the excessively high duty on imports have led to curtailed official gold import by the country during FY ’13.
Tariff value is the base price on which the customs duty on imported gold or silver is calculated and it further helps prevent under-invoicing.

Massive 8.2 Quake Hits Near Chile Coast, Tsunami Warning Issued; Residents Evacuating

Massive 8.2 Quake Hits Near Chile Coast, Tsunami Warning Issued; Residents Evacuating
At shortly after 1945 ET,  a massive 8.2 (revised up from 8.0) earthquake hit close to the coast of Chile:
  • *MAGNITUDE 8.0 QUAKE HITS OFF COAST OF CHILE, USGS REPORTS
  • *CHILE QUAKE MAGNITUDE REVISED UP FROM 8.0 TO 8.2 BY USGS
  • *FLASH: TSUNAMI WARNING ISSUED AFTER MAGNITUDE 8.0 QUAKE HITS OFF
  • *QUAKE CUTS ELECTRICITY SUPPLY TO MUCH OF ARICA, CHILE: TVN
The BBC reports the quake was shallow (which means it felt more powerful) and the tsunami wave's arrival is imminent



Copper prices was jumping on the news as the region is an active mining area.
Massive 8.2 Quake Hits Near Chile Coast, Tsunami Warning Issued; Residents Evacuating

Following reassurances:
  • *TECK SAYS QUEBRADA BLANCA COPPER MINE UNAFFECTED BY QUAKE
  • *PAN PACIFIC SAYS NO DAMAGE AT CASERONES COPPER MINE AFTER QUAKE

For some context of how big this is...
Massive 8.2 Quake Hits Near Chile Coast, Tsunami Warning Issued; Residents Evacuating


Chinalco forced to halt Peru’s copper project over ongoing pollution

Chinalco forced to halt Peru’s copper project over ongoing pollution
Chinalco Mining Corporation, a subsidiary of China-own Chinalco, said Monday it had to partially halt its activities at the Toromocho copper project in Peru, as the country’s environmental watchdog ordered it Friday to do so (in Spanish) because of environmental concerns.
After inspections carried out from March 16 to March 20, the agency concluded that Chinalco has been dumping waste in the Huacrococha and Huascacocha lakes.
The environmental regulator posted a video showing a yellow-coloured liquid flowing into the mentioned waterways, which presented a higher than allowed level of contaminants at the time of the assessments.
Toromocho, in central Peru, is set to become one of the largest copper and molybdenum plants in the world. It began initial production in December last year and is scheduled to reach full production in the third quarter of 2014.
Peru is the world's second biggest copper producer. Chinalco has been developing the US$3.4 billion Toromocho since 2008.

The how and when of Chinese stimulus

The how and when of Chinese stimulus
The world's second largest economy is slowing down and dragging all resource-based economies down with it.
China's leaders want to move the country from an investment-led economy to one based on consumption.
But the rebalancing is proving difficult and signs of a slowdown are not hard to find.
Consensus forecast for 2014 growth in China is 7.4%, just below the official target rate set by the government (a number widely believed to be massaged so as to produce the required level).
GDP expansion at 7.4% would be the slowest in 24 years.
Something that's causing alarm among resource companies reliant on Chinese demand.
China watchers are now waiting with bated breath for the government to inject cash to rev up the economy again.
Just like the $640 billion (4 trillion yuan) package delivered in 2008-2009 that made China the only major economy to continue growing strongly through the financial crisis.
That's not going to happen says Capital Economics.
The independent research house parsed Premier Li Keqiang's speech delivered to a meeting of provincial leaders last week.
He spoke of "targeted measures", mentioned "last year's successful experience in fighting the economic slowdown" and cautioned on shifting macroeconomic policies" which may be effective in the short term but is not necessarily beneficial for the future":
The key contrast here is not just with the stimulus of 2008/09 but also with the mini-stimulus of 2012. Two years ago, as after the global financial crisis, government support took the form of across-the-board credit loosening. Policymakers took a different, more discriminating, approach in the spring and summer of last year when, as now, many were worrying about a hard landing.
Support came in the form of speeded up project approvals and budgetary spending. Credit growth slowed. This provides a model for what to expect over the months ahead. We are likely to see some new infrastructure projects given the go-ahead, work on ongoing projects accelerated, some restrictions loosened – notably on property purchases – and faster disbursement of some budgeted funds.
In any event, when looking at China in absolute terms the slowdown does not seem so alarming anymore.
Growth in 2014 would indeed be the slowest since 1990 – in the mid-Nineties Chinese growth rates peaked at an eye-watering 30%.
But mainland China is tacking onto its economy some $700 billion this year.
That's equal to the size of its entire economy in 1994.
And as big as the Swiss economy and the equivalent GDP of two South Africas and four New Zealands.